this is one directed by amy berg, and is a collection of interviews with the priest that blew the scandal open - oliver o'grady - some of his victims and their lawyers. it seemed that they tried to get a response from the US catholic church and the vatican, but they did not respond to the producers' requests.so they had to use archived deposition footage during oliver o'grady's trials.
i work the morning shift this week (we take turns to start work at about 6am), so you can imagine how tired i am at 10pm.
but that was the time we started watching this show, and it held my attention for the full two hours (or slightly less).
if you're expecting drama and guns, you'd be bored stiff. again, it's just a collection of interviews, not unlike michael moore films.
the difference between amy berg and michael moore is the classification of their work, the former's being a documentary, and the latter's being a movie. i'm not sure if that really makes it more "credible", but what we saw in the show did seem like the director tried to get views from both sides.
in essence, o'grady started sexually abusing kids in the early 70s. and everytime a complaint was filed with the bishop, he would just move o'grady to another parish further away.
when a case finally went to the courts, the church cut a deal - which includes him being financially cared for, for the rest of his life - with o'grady. as long as he refused to testify.
it was really interesting to see o'grady being so candid in his comments. it made him more human, and the catholic church more distant.
the bit that got me really upset was when the father of one of o'grady's female victims started crying and blaming himself for not being able to stop the abuse.
he has not been able to step into a church since.
again, this documentary may just be another michael moore-type thing.
but where there's smoke, there's fire.
this is definitely worth a watch. even for catholics.


